Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Collaborative Digital Writing

Collaborative digital writing is a no brainer: it possesses all the features that excite kids about writing.
• Working on a preferred platform: the computer.
• Letting the authors’ creativity shine
• Playing an intricate game of tag while bouncing ideas from one student to another
• Adding multimedia content to strengthen the impact of the writing
• Creating a real message for an authentic audience beyond the classroom or the teacher

Beware: without that audience, the whole thing will flop! Sure, kids can write online for the teacher but what kind of an audience is that? What motivates kids to write is what they value in the process. Students value the work they do when they know that someone “out there” is waiting to read their piece. They’ll give you their best effort because someone else cares about what they have to say.

Sure, there will be students who won’t want to work in groups because they think they work b
etter by themselves. That’s where the whole-class modeling recommended by Bledsoe as his step 1 of collaborative digital writing comes in. It can prove to those students that their writing will be enriched by others’ suggestions. It’s the leap-frogging of ideas that leads Bledsoe to reflect that: “Students working independently would unlikely have reached a plot rich with so many twists and turns (p. 55).”

My word of caution? Think carefully about your assessment of the students’ work before you even begin. Who will evaluate the work? Bledsoe would recommend having the audience evaluate (at least partially) the students, because “The best evaluation will come from an outsider (p. 64).” Will students earn an individual grade? A group grade? Both? If you are going to assess a group grade, what will be its basis? Participation? Content & quality of the final draft? Self-assessments? My rule of thumb is: For every element you assess, ask yourself: if my own child received a poor grade there, what would I want the teacher to tell me? Be ready to justify your thinking around assessment. As a parent I’ve seen too many collaborative projects where my son’s grade suffered because of issues with the group. For example, someone didn’t do their part of the work and the teacher held the group responsible by lowering their individual grades. Children should not be expected to police each other: that’s the teacher’s job.

As for classroom applications at the elementary level, I certainly agree with Bledsoe that storytelling lends itself perfectly to collaborative digital writing. The same could be said for all genres of writing because they allow for total student creativity. But the process would also work for social studies or science writing, such the state brochures or regions projects we do or explaining the findings of a group’s scientific experiment. To increase the collaborative element of such projects, I would ask other groups to give feedback during the revising stage, asking probing questions that might help deepen the group’s thinking.

Finally, my favorite type of collaborative digital writing is the one done across grade levels, where older students work collaboratively to provide answers to younger students’ questions. For example, an intermediate or middle school class could respond to primary students’ questions about the motivation of literature characters: “Mr. Wolf, how did you blow a house down by puffing? And why did you eat two pigs? Wasn’t one enough?” or “Goldilocks, why did you leave such a mess in the Bears’ house,” etc. Likewise, older students could serve as the experts that younger students turn to explain scientific processes, historical events, etc. Think of it as your own in-house “ask an expert!”

There are so many other ideas! Please share yours!

3 comments:

  1. I am definitely more drawn to the idea of collaborative writing in science - I find it so benefitial for students to talk over their ideas first, then write. BUT do we have to do this digitally or is that just scraping to find a way to integrate technology?

    I was also intrigued by the idea of creating a class collaborative writing project but agree (you hit the nail on the head) describing all the thinking that needs to go into the assessments BEFORE starting the project. At this point, that seems a bit too big of a project to tackle!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I wonder...how different really is it to assess the writing students contribute in a group as opposed to their own writing? I don't have the classroom perspective here, as I am intricately tied to the work my students do in writing and pretty much know exactly what's their work as opposed to work they do with support from me.

    It makes no sense to give everyone in a group the same grade on something, because really they can't possibly all have similar skill levels. It surprises me that you've experienced that with your kids Isa...I really wouldn't expect that teachers would do that kind of thing anymore.

    As a classroom teacher Molly, how hard is it for you to isolate how much individual students contribute to group projects?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Isa-

    I absolutely agree with you. Fair and accurate assesment of students' collaborative projects (writing or otherwise) is of paramount import. As teachers, we can validate or negate students' efforts and experiences simply in the way that we assess them.

    Maria

    ReplyDelete